TODAY'S TOPICS: The Real Thompson, Libby Commute, A General, Fear as Control, Impeach Cheney, Live Earth, High Schoolers!
"You would have to be dead to be unaffected by Moore's movie…If popular, the movie will have a negative impact on our image in this community."
-- Barclay Fitzpatrick, Vice President of Corporate Communications, Capital BlueCross in secret memo about the threat the film Sicko poses to the insurance industry
Many of America's most prominent journalists want us to forget what they were saying and writing more than four years ago to boost the invasion of Iraq. Now, they tiptoe around their own roles in hyping the war and banishing dissent to the media margins....More than four years -- and at least several hundred thousand Iraqi civilian deaths -- later, the most reliable epidemiology available confirms that those claims were more than misleading. They were fundamentally out of touch with human reality.
-- Norm Solomon on the media as war salesman
AMERICAN IGNORANCE
(You got to give our stupid masses some credit for consistency I guess...)
Newsweek poll found that fully 40 percent of American adults continue to believe that Iraq was directly involved in the 9/11 attacks.
END
THE FRED THOMPSON NIXON CONNECTION…("Mr. Outsider"...really???)
FROM Down With Tyranny:
On this slow news day– a somewhat mournful Independence Day two days after the mask of constitutional government slipped off Bush’s smug face to expose the brutal GOP fascist beast beneath, the Boston Globe unmasks the real Fred Thompson.
Thompson made his bones working as a lawyer for Tennessee Republican Howard Baker during the impeachment hearing for the only American president held in as much disdain as the currently unimpeached one. But, now it turns out that Thompson was a spy, or a secret mole, for the Nixon criminal clique in the White House.
Thompson tipped off the White House that the committee knew about the taping system and would be making the information public. In his all-but-forgotten Watergate memoir, "At That Point in Time," Thompson said he acted with "no authority" in divulging the committee's knowledge of the tapes, which provided the evidence that led to Nixon's resignation. It was one of many Thompson leaks to the Nixon team, according to a former investigator for Democrats on the committee, Scott Armstrong, who remains upset at Thompson's actions.
Thompson declared in a June 6 radio commentary that Libby's conviction was a "shocking injustice . . . created and enabled by federal officials." Bush on Monday commuted Libby's 30-month sentence, stopping short of a pardon. The intensity of Thompson's remarks about Libby is reminiscent of how he initially felt about Nixon. Few Republicans were stronger believers in Nixon during the early days of Watergate.
Underhanded deceptions? Two-timing? Serving more than one master? No wonder the current GOP views Thompson as some great Presidential hope.
END
THE LIBBY COMMUTATION: Crooks and Liars...
Watch the interview of Jonathan Turley on Olbermann where he outlines Libby’s defense team strategy of pressuring Cheney to help him out of multiple convictions. Not that Cheney didn’t plan to bail out his pal, but they made sure to turn the screws so to speak.
“If you ask any criminal defense attorney, they said we would make Dick Cheney the focus of the trial. He is perfect. He’s all over this case. It really was an investigation about what Dick Cheney ordered, what Dick Cheney said, what Dick Cheney did. It’s just that Dick Cheney wasn’t indicted. So no one was that surprised when the defense team made it clear they were going to call him to the trial and they were going to take the gloves off. And then suddenly, it changed and they said they were not going to call him.”
Watch this clip:
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/07/05/turley-outlines-libbys-team-putting-the-squeeze-on-cheney/
More "Commute" Analysis by the best in the business:
Hovering above all this is one all-encompassing question: did George W. Bush commit a dead-bang impeachable offense by commuting Libby's sentence?
A wise man once said that the life of the law is procedure. There are processes to be undertaken, papers to be filed and forms to be obeyed. In this commutation, no procedures whatsoever appear to have been followed. The haste in which this action was undertaken smacks of fear, desperation, and of a cover-up in process.
Consider the factors.
Libby's legal defense from the first day of his trial was that he was a fall guy taking the rap for others. Fitzgerald pointedly stated that the details surrounding Libby's actions put a cloud of suspicion over Vice President Dick Cheney. Combine these two details and you wind up with Libby standing as a patsy taking the rap for Cheney.
Bush has the constitutional power to offer commutations, of course. But if this commutation was granted to Libby in order to derail a criminal investigation, if it was granted to cover up prior or ongoing criminal activities, that is itself a crime meriting the impeachment of George W. Bush. This, more than anything else, must be investigated.
-- Will Pitt on the Libby commutation
Libby had to have understood, without a word ever being passed, that leniency of some sort would be granted. His steadfast cover-up was encouraged by his intimate knowledge of the methods of Cheney and Bush. The fine he must pay - $250,000 - is meaningless because he will certainly not be paying it himself. His legal defense fund, supported by the friends of the president and vice-president, boasts a treasury of $5m. He has been well taken care of.
The pardon is the one monarchical power that the framers of the constitution assigned the presidency. But they placed one restriction, that it could not be exercised for impeachment. In other words, the president could not use his power to pardon himself. Bush is entirely within his narrow right to use the pardon power in the Libby case. But it violates the spirit, if not the letter, of the law governing that power because it is a consummate gesture of self-exoneration, at least if the vice-president is an “entity within the executive branch”. Bush rewards Libby’s cover-up, thwarting the investigation into Cheney’s and perhaps his culpability. Bush’s commutation is the successful culmination of the obstruction of justice.
-- Sydney Blumenthal on the Libby commutation
MORE VIDEOS
Impeach Cheney video by the great Robert Greenwald...a must see!
http://impeachcheney.org/
You got to see two of those high school presidential scholar students that confronted bush with the letter opposing torture as an instrument of US foreign policy interviewed by Amy Goodman. Watch:
http://alternet.org/blogs/video/55980/
Mike Papantonio talks about how the modern GOP lives in an alternative reality...or as I like to call it, "Bizarro World" (apparently this is the realm they live in 24/7 now). A place where men like "Scooter" Libby, who has participated in treason, or others like Libby, Abramoff, Delay, Rove, Liddy, are celebrated as folk heroes. Nice to see a radio host pick up on this:
http://alternet.org/blogs/video/56004/
ARTICLE SECTION: Huffington and Gen. Odom
FEAR AS CONTROL
Arrianna Huffington writes an important piece on the continued, as now seen yet again with the Britain terror scare, use of fear to keep the masses under control, distracted, and confused.
A few clips:
The thinking of people like Lieberman and King (to say nothing of Bush and Cheney), when it comes to terrorism is as illogical as it is entrenched. It goes something like this: When someone attacks -- or tries to attack -- us or one of our allies because we are a free society, we should respond by making ourselves less free. That'll show the bastards!
SNIP
When it comes to the threat of terrorism, it seems that if the government isn't trying to scare us to death, the press is. The exploitation of fear continues to be our leaders' and our media's ace in the hole -- for votes, for ratings, for curtailing our freedoms.
http://alternet.org/columnists/story/55933/
A GENERAL COMES FORWARD
How good is this to see? A General who served under Reagan setting the record straight in regards to what in fact IS, and what in fact ISN'T, "supporting the troops". Let us all pray that every weak knee'd, sniffling and sulking, and jellie fish spined Democrat that still is afraid to cut off funding for the WAR (not the trooops) reads this. Here's how this basic logic goes, see if you can follow. It's NOT supporting the troops to keep sending them into the middle of a civil war in a desert on the other side of the world, where all sides view you as an invader, occupier, and murderer of their family and brethren. Still with me? Two, it IS supporting the troops to bring them home so they can live a full life, see their family and friend's again, and after some rest, continue to do the job they always wanted to do in the first place: actually protect America.
Somehow the clear as daylight, unequivocable, and absolutely undeniable logic of this basic premise is more than many Democrats can grasp. So, as more American's die for a lie, have their very minds and mental health shattered in a sea of death and fear, and the wealth of our nation squandered on a war everyone knows was for a variety of nefarious reasons never given, we still have Congress members believing they can't end this war because it will make THEM look unpatriotic. Thankfully, we now have a decorated GENERAL to make this case again...and help provide cover for those remaining Dems that still fear that they will be accused of not supporting the troops by bringing them home from an illegal war based on lies.
A few clips first:
If the Democrats truly want to succeed in forcing President Bush to begin withdrawing from Iraq, the first step is to redefine “supporting the troops” as withdrawing them, citing the mass of accumulating evidence of the psychological as well as the physical damage that the president is forcing them to endure because he did not raise adequate forces. Both Democrats and Republicans in Congress could confirm this evidence and lay the blame for “not supporting the troops” where it really belongs - on the president. And they could rightly claim to the public that they are supporting the troops by cutting off the funds that he uses to keep U.S. forces in Iraq.
SNIP
To force him to begin a withdrawal before then, the first step should be to rally the public by providing an honest and candid definition of what “supporting the troops” really means and pointing out who is and who is not supporting our troops at war. The next step should be a flat refusal to appropriate money for to be used in Iraq for anything but withdrawal operations with a clear deadline for completion. The final step should be to put that president on notice that if he ignores this legislative action and tries to extort Congress into providing funds by keeping U.S. forces in peril, impeachment proceeding will proceed in the House of Representatives. Such presidential behavior surely would constitute the “high crime” of squandering the lives of soldiers and Marines for his own personal interest.
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/07/06/2325/
THINK FAST
"Global warming is radically changing the face of Mount Everest, the sons of the men who first reached its summit 54 years ago said." The sons of Sir Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay say "their fathers would no longer recognise the world̢۪s highest mountain," noting the base camp is now 132 feet lower than it was 53 years ago.
Triple-digit temperatures are expected to set records in parts of the West. Forecasters predicted a high of 107 in Boise, ID, and 125 in Baker, CA. Residents in some states were warned "that outdoor activities could be dangerous except during the cooler early morning hours."
Eighteen people died in Baghdad "after a car bomb blew up outside a photo shop here as members of a wedding party waited Thursday night for the newlyweds to get their pictures taken."
CHENEY SECTION: Global Warming...and Hookers?
CHENEY'S MANIPULATION: On global warming, as on the war in Iraq, the Bush administration's policy outcomes have been "predetermined, in spite of the voluminous evidence that it would lead to catastrophe." New reports show that Vice President Cheney took "full advantage of the president's cluelessness" on climate change and dominated the policies. On Sept. 29, 2000, Bush pledged, "We will require all power plants to meet clean-air standards in order to reduce emissions of...carbon dioxide within a reasonable period of time." In February and March 2001, then Environmental Protection Agency administrator Christine Todd Whitman urged the White House to take steps to combat global warming, but she was overruled. Instead, Cheney armed the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) with industry heavyweights. Thereafter, "a CEQ memo concluded Bush's promise to regulate CO2 'did not fully reflect the president's position' and that 'it would be premature at this time to propose any specific policy or approach aimed at addressing global warming.'" The authors of the memo stated that "the current state of scientific knowledge about causes of and solutions to global warming is inconclusive." CEQ chief of staff Philip Cooney, who worked for the oil industry before joining the White House and then joined Exxon in 2005, repeatedly censored government reports to play down the links between global warming and human activities. In March, Cooney admitted to the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, "My objective was to align these communications with the administration's stated policy" of climate skepticism. Evidence also shows that the Vice President's office was in regular contact with CEQ. Kevin O'Donovan, an aide in Cheney's office, wrote a memo to Cooney suggesting they try to "reinvigorate debate on the actual climate history of the past thousand years."
How unbelievable would it be that one of the most nefarious war criminals and sociopaths of the 21st Century could finally get busted for using call girls? Whatever it takes in my opinion...
Injunction lifted: DC Madam Can't Confirm Cheney On ListPhone Records To Be Shared With Media and Bloggers
Guest blogged by Joseph Cannon (Brad Blog):
"For months, the so-called "DC Madam" --- Deborah Jeane Palfrey --- has been forbidden by a court injunction from discussing or sharing the contents of the meticulous phone records she kept of her Washington D.C. client base.Before the injunction was handed down, ABC News' Brian Ross had received a partial list. Ross declared, in a broadcast report, that the phone records did not point to any "newsworthy" individuals beyond the three known names of Randall Tobias (former head of the Agency for International Development), Harlan Ullman (developer of the "shock and awe" military doctrine) and former presidential adviser Dick Morris.ABC dealt only with records going back five years, and did not have access to the earlier records.
Long-standing rumors --- as-yet unconfirmed --- have held that Vice President Dick Cheney used Palfrey's escort service, Pamela Martin and Associates, in the 1990s, while he was still the CEO of Haliburton. Less than two hours ago, Judge Kessler released the injunction. Palfrey is now free to make those phone records available to any journalists or bloggers who ask for them. She has set out certain circumstances for their release; her primary hope is that those looking into the matter will do so thoroughly. Palfrey has expressed disappointment in ABC's treatment of this story.When contacted by BradBlog, Palfrey first expressed her thanks to Judge Kessler. "This decision could have gone either way," said Palfrey, "given our current political climate."In her decision, the Judge wrote:
The List in question is the Defendant's personal property and contains only a log of telephone numbers. It was neither seized by the Government when it searched the Defendant's residence in California, nor listed in the Indictment putting the Defendant on notice as to which items of her property were subject to forfeiture.The question everyone is asking is this: Can Ms. Palfrey confirm that Dick Cheney was a client?"
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=4775
GOOD NEWS...
LIVE EARTH: The ten Live Earth concerts will be broadcast to 2 billion people in more than 100 countries. Even Antarctica will have a performance by the indie rock band Nunatak, which is "made up of five scientists aged 22 to 28 who are stationed on the generally unpopulated continent." Recognizing that large concerts often have damaging environmental footprints, the organizers of Live Earth are striving to make the events as ecofriendly as possible. Each artist has been given "a 'Green Handbook' of touring tips, such as where to get biodiesel for their trucks and how to offset carbon emissions." Electricity to power the concerts will come from renewable energy sources, and greenhouse gases from the "stars' jets or by the audience's travel will be offset by investments in renewable energy and by safeguarding forests. Concert props may live on long after stars such as Madonna, Shakira and Bon Jovi have left the stage -- old tires and oil drums used in the New York set will be re-used while some concert signs in Johannesburg will be used as roofing." The seven-point Live Earth Pledge asks individuals to demand that their countries "join an international treaty within the next two years that cuts global warming pollution by 90 percent in developed countries and by more than half worldwide." It also "asks people to cut their own pollution, to make their homes, business, schools and transport more energy efficient, and to plant new trees and preserve forests." "We have to get all nations involved, but in order to accomplish that we have to bring about a sea change in public opinion," said Gore. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) both signed the pledge in June.
